.
Feedback

Paramount RFP Creates Excitement, Questions

News that the City of Peekskill is seeking out proposals for the Paramount has local theater managers excited.

 

Local theaters in the Hudson Valley are eagerly awaiting the City of Peekskill’s RFP for a new management team at the Paramount Center for Performance Arts.

Still, that excitement will remain tempered until more details about the theater’s financial standing are revealed.

The city owns the theater and leases it out to Paramount’s board of directors, but does not manage the building's day-to day operations. The Peekskill Common Council announced it was seeking proposals during Monday's meeting. The Paramount's board of director's announced the theater is temporarily closing for financial reasons on Oct. 3. 


“We would have to consider the RFP,” Bjorn Olsson, executive director of the 843-seat Tarrytown Music Hall. “We think the Paramount should be a viable stage in Westchester and we would definitely consider putting in a proposal. A lot of it depends on what details come out of the RFP. We don’t know what they’re looking for yet.”

Olsson said the Tarrytown Music Hall has been able to grow despite the recession and he believes the same thing can happen in Peekskill.

“We’re on such a different track,” Olsson said. “We’ve been growing 10 to 30 percent each year. It’s possible that we could grow even more if the recession had not been there, but we haven’t really slowed down. What we found here is a good balance between being there for the community and bringing in big artists. We would try to apply what we learned here in Peekskill.”

Chris Silva, executive director of the Bardavon in Poughkeepsie and the Ulster Performing Arts Center in Kingston, said he received a friendly phone call from a Peekskill official asking if he would be interested in submitting a proposal to manage the Paramount a few weeks ago.

Silva said he finished the phone call with a number of unanswered questions.

“We’ve taken over organizations like the Hudson Valley Philharmonic and the UPAC, but those were different situations," Silva said. "The Paramount is a different world. It’s in Westchester. It’s not just across the river from us like the UPAC. But more importantly, we need to know more information like what happened before it closed. What’s going on over there?”

Lisa Reilly, executive director the 275-seat Emelin Theater, said the situation with the Paramount is being followed closely throughout the county.

“I think everybody in the cultural community wants to see the Paramount succeed and we’re willing to whatever we can that is in our power to make that happen,” Reilly said.

Peter Goodson October 24, 2012 at 10:10 pm
If Foster and Klaxton have anything to do with this process then kiss it all goodbye. They screw up everything they touch.
john basic October 24, 2012 at 11:06 pm
Have the current board of directors officially been dismissed by the City of Peekskill?
I would hope so.
joshua tanner October 25, 2012 at 03:04 am
Well the city had all the locks changed and is calling for new oversight. I wonder if the crew running the city would have been this strong if the board president wasn't a former GOP Mayor who criticized Foster last election
Walden Macnair October 25, 2012 at 12:18 pm
This is just more proof that the government shouldn't run private enterprises. Theaters, golf courses, amusement parks can all be done better by industries that do that as a business. Run the theater at a profit and pay the city for the franchise.
I've never run a theater but I do know one thing. If your ticket sales do not exceed your expenses you will lose money. Sounds simple to me.
Patty Villanova October 25, 2012 at 12:31 pm
Finally- they're bringing in some outside professionals who actually know what they're doing and who have experience in theater management. Like most of what happens in the morass of city government, this is long overdue.. Like I said previously, the remaining business owners and restaurants are going to take a big hit this Holiday season if the Paramount is dark which is most likely. The mismanagement of the Paramount for at least the last 10 years, by the non-profit and its board of directors has been responsible in large part for the weak economic development of Downtown Peekskill. The Paramount is the anchor store of the mall to use an analogy and it was mostly closed and not being used to its potential. The various directors tried, especially Jon Yanofsky who brought in some of the finest jazz performers, but they could never overcome the problems with the directors who were clueless. There needs to be an outside forensic investigation of the board and a full report to the community. The Paramount was getting financial support from neighboring communities as well as other tax dollars from outside Peekskill. Vesce & Co. are accountable to all of us and I am watching with great interest to see how Foster, Klaxton, et al handle this disgraceful situation.
NorthCountyHound October 25, 2012 at 01:33 pm
If they were able to attract some decent acts instead of has beens and wanna bes and it wasn't where it is, they could do well. Peekskill is a nasty dump. Who want's to sit there worrying about their car outside. I only go there when I absolutley have to and never without a weapon.
Ray Adamick October 25, 2012 at 06:15 pm
I thought it had landmark Status??
Ray Adamick October 25, 2012 at 06:17 pm
Stay home North, we don't need you!
john basic October 25, 2012 at 06:59 pm
Peekskill is fine overall with many fine restaurants. If you want to walk around the streets at 2am then you may have a point North. Otherwise just relax and come to Peekskill and have a nice dinner sometimes.
Ray Adamick October 25, 2012 at 09:39 pm
You tell 'em John
JM October 25, 2012 at 10:39 pm
In all the discussions on this great building, which if I had the money I'd submit an RFP myself and launch a new career, no one seems to ask: who is the audience and what do ''we'' (within acceptable travel distance) want/expect/desire of the space.
I've only lived in Peekskill four years, but no one has ever approached me on this topic. I've never been mailed a survey from the theater, which gets to perhaps the most important issue of all -- what would attract me to pay money and attend an event? Have seen several suggestions about following the Jacob Burns model, where I've been once. Now, when all is said and done, dragging oneself 20 miles vs. having a drink at home, relaxing and putting on just about the same film here at home as Jacob Burns would show, free, makes the decision simple as eating your favorite pie. Nonetheless, what if the Paramount did had a similar venue as Pleasantville? Foreign and emerging films, followed by the director's conversation, for example. No doubt I'd go, since it's two minutes away, no sweat. But no one asked for my input. Lastly, and a p.s. to northcountyhound, since I pay $11K a year in property taxes to own a house in Peeksill, I disagree most strongly that we live in a dump. Yes, there are issues, as with all cities, but I like it here -- or I wouldn't live here. So do stay home, please. We don't need bad energy.
ED HICKEY October 26, 2012 at 11:35 am
I second Josh's sentiment; exciting news.
NorthCountyHound October 26, 2012 at 01:18 pm
most of which will go out of biz w/o the paramount.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Peekskill-Cortlandt Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
shakemdown June 19, 2013 at 12:03 am
@ASHLEY TARR my comments that i posted did not contain profanity nor did they harrass or abuseRead More anyone, they were just what the forum is for, to discuss issues within our city. but i know, some people would consider it harrasment or would try to have it deleted because the truth hurts,and that's what some of our elected officials don't want you to hear, (the truth)
shakemdown June 19, 2013 at 12:06 am
@jo you are right, the old web site was 100% better then this and it was more user friendly unlikeRead More this new one . BRING BACK THE OLD ONE
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 19, 2013 at 07:04 am
By the way, in our new system we have an update that includes a community moderation tool—it'sRead More not only Patch editors who can flag comments. What is it? Readers can flag any content they find objectionable on any Patch site at any time. We’ve put the flagging link in more places to make it easier to find and backed it with more sophisticated tools. Our goal is to recognize and reward readers who make our community great. How does it work? You’ll see these words — Flag as Inappropriate — on the top and bottom of Board posts, articles, blogs and notes, and next to every single comment anywhere on the site. To flag something, you simply click those words. What happens when you flag? It alerts us that something might be up with the content. When should you flag? We ask that you use your common sense and a general spirit of openness. You should never flag things that you simply disagree with and certainly not to clarify minor points. We encourage you to comment, post (or even start your own blog) to be heard on those things. You can review the Patch Terms of Use Ashley referred to above.
sue June 17, 2013 at 07:00 pm
don't know why I'm having a problem getting this written............anyway...they are rude,Read More unhygenic and WILL NOT follow any of the condo rules....there's so much more but we are sick of it. There are only two of us that speak up...everyone else is cowering behind closed doors.
joshua tanner June 18, 2013 at 03:00 pm
Unleashed dogs is getting to be a big problem in Peekskill. I see them routinely now. People areRead More letting their pit bulls out, their poodles, their chihuahuas - all kinds of dogs. Two days a go I watched a lady jogging on the track with her loose dog. The dog wasn't even supposed to be on the track no less loose. Some kid or elderly lady is going to get bit. Loose dogs also end up in more fights with other dogs.
sayitsnotsojack June 19, 2013 at 09:15 am
Sue a sad fact that these days of “political correctness” individuals who exhibit rudeRead More and ignorant behavior are empowered by the rest of us. I know of a similar situation where the individuals will yell four letter words in the public areas with young children there, call others the foulest things, and in this case, they are black and gay so the race/gay card is used constantly. Until people make it known they are not going to tolerate their behavior it will not stop. Have you notified the property owner, complex board, and police, or maybe the board of health?
Nancy O'Connor June 17, 2013 at 09:33 am
It was our pleasure to help out....good food, good weather, all around good time!!
leesther brown June 18, 2013 at 11:48 am
@Nancy,,I Thanked both you and Pauline Ghilcrest for serving the community and they took my commentsRead More down twice!!! Once again Thank You..you're automatically signed up for next year..:)
joshua tanner June 15, 2013 at 10:28 pm
It seems Patch moves editors every year. Liz was here when I signed up. Then she was shortly movedRead More to Rye and Rasheed took over. He must have been here about a year and then he left when the new format was introduced. Both times patch started cooking and then it got cut down just as new staff got their mojo going. A new editor with a new format seems like starting from scratch again. I know AOL/Patch needs to get some cash flow going quick (from what I've read) but I can't see what they are trying to do exactly by tipping the cart over and over
Wendy Kelly June 17, 2013 at 08:37 am
Agree Joshua just when you have a good thing going with an Editor they move. I can't figure thisRead More site out I was not allowed to post for at least a week thought Mary et al put an hex on me. Hey anyone know where Peter Goodson is??? I miss his posts.
jo June 18, 2013 at 10:12 am
new format is a dud.. 100% dud.. not user friendly.. a horror to navigate, as mentioned... noRead More benefit here. not at all.. quickly becoming a ex Patch fan... fix the mess you made..
Wendy Kelly June 15, 2013 at 11:03 am
http://search.lohud.com/sp?aff=1100&skin=&keywords=revitalization of Peekskill
Working Families Party endorsed candidate Mary Foster
Robin Seggs June 14, 2013 at 10:44 am
Working Families Party almost always cross endorses with Democrats. Looks like the choice isRead More getting clearer: One team is Democrat, WFP and Independent and the Catalina Team is Republican, Right-to-life, Conservative. Anyway, I believe Catalina is campaigning as anti-gay rights, so I know how I will be voting.
jo June 14, 2013 at 02:28 pm
and so many in the cast of characters that attend the meetings. believe Mary is a republican atRead More heart.. and here the Left of all left dem groups endorses here..mmmmmmmm just thinking out loud..
stephanie June 14, 2013 at 03:57 pm
mary foster and the rest of her butt kissers not need to run after what they have done to this cityRead More already we don't need them to run another term they neeed to get out and stay out. i believe frank catalina will much better than foster will ever be he cares about the city and does not like what foster has done to this city i wish him very much luck and i truly believe he will win as our mayor for peekskill good luck and kick foster and her butt kissers out of city hall and keep them out
af24us June 12, 2013 at 01:48 pm
I agree - the dangerous stop signs On Hudson Ave should be removed in both directions and keep theRead More stop signs on South St. and the exit ramps from Route 9.