News Alert
Man with New Family Accused of Killing Old One in …

Letter to the Editor: Panio Liquors Owner Suggests Alternative Plan for Firehouse Location

David Pacchiana suggets shifting Park Street 100 yards north to build the firehouse on the flatter part of the empty lot across from Crossroads.

I am writing as a follow-up to Liz Giegerich’s article from June 11 entitled “City Officials Consider Environmental Impact of Central Firehouse”. 

 I don't think the City has reached an agreement to buy the Crossroads Shopping Plaza so they would have to invoke eminent domain on that property as well. Under the proposal that was approved by the Town Council, $2.75 mil was budgeted for land acquisition fees. If the City uses eminent domain to acquire the two remaining parcels, the cost will undoubtedly far exceed the budget.

Consider that in the Crossroads alone, six businesses will be displaced/relocated at a cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars (by law, the City would be required to pay prevailing wage for re-location and business fixture improvements). According to published articles, the City offered the owner of the Crossroads $1 million even though he paid $2 million for it twenty years ago. When you consider that the current tenants likely pay far in excess of $200K of rent annually to the landlord (for the portion the City wants), it’s obvious the City's offer is far too low. (Disclosure: I rent one of the spaces so I have first-hand knowledge of the approximate rent roll). Furthermore, almost all eminent domain cases rule in favor of the property owners because municipality offers are typically far below market value. Elected officials realize that eminent domain proceedings take years and they are usually no longer in office when the true value of the property must be ponied up to the landowners. In essence, through eminent domain, the current administration can put off paying the true value of the property for years (and leave for others to deal with) but eventually taxpayers will be left footing the bill.

I do have a possible solution that would save the City and its taxpayers millions of dollars of land acquisition fees. 

The firehouse planners ruled out building the firehouse on the lot just south of the Crossroads across Park Street (which is empty) primarily because they did not want to build into the hillside next to Brown St.  However, they could shift Park St about 100 hundred yards north of its current location so it cuts through a sparsely used area in the parking lot of the Crossroads (Park St is currently asymmetrical as it cuts across Broad St so it would be flipped from the south to the north side). In this scenario, there would be plenty of space to build in an unused flat area adjacent to the brick building on the west end of the lot and no businesses would have to be relocated. They could build the same exact firehouse on an identical footprint a couple of hundred yards from the current plan. The only difference is this location doesn't have the same "chest-pumping, in your face, look at what we built, Welcome to Peekskill" bravado for all to admire as they drove into the city on its main thoroughfare.

The current plan to use eminent domain has many losers; the property owners, businesses, employees, many loyal shoppers, taxpayers, future political leaders, real estate and sales tax rolls, etc. The only winners would be the firemen who rightfully deserve a new facility but for the most part are indifferent to its location and the egos of the politicians who are trying to force this through without properly considering all of the ill effects on the stakeholders involved. 

David Pacchiana

Owner, Panio Wines and Liquors

Crossroads Shopping Plaza, Peekskill

JM June 25, 2012 at 01:17 PM
David, In my view what a world of difference it would have made to this city had the owners of said Crossroad Plaza reinvested some of that rent money over the years to create an aesthetically pleasing, landscape-attractive shopping area instead of the state-prison-motif it has been in since well before the firehouse was planned. Perhaps what you propose would have a stronger taxpayer sell coupled with a complete makeover of Crossroads too. Otherwise, in my view, I'll be very glad to see it leveled and the proposed firehouse complex in its place.
Branwen MacDonald June 25, 2012 at 07:02 PM
I don't know all the details of this issue but it does seem that when you figure the true cost in legal fees and paying market value for the property, you could use that significant amount to make adjustments to another site already owned by the city, even if that site were less than perfect. Also, if we gave up a little square footage, would another site that was previously ruled out be back in the running? Because my takeaway from the meeting was that the community use area was a "want" rather than a "need." I agree with the previous poster that crossroads is an eyesore and would contribute more to the community if it were redone to face outwards (for starters) but that is a separate issue.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »